Graduatorie da rifare per i soci ANIEF ricorrenti June 11, 2009 - New ANIEF
dell'ANIEF successful hit against the DM update 42/09 rankings, as expected. Lists to be redone for members ANIEF
applicants with a rapidity never heard, the judges of the TAR Lazio have five days in a ruling issued flash, SHORT, favorable, not discussing the pre-trial phase, a new application submitted by the pilot legali dell'ANIEF, avv. Ganci e Miceli, per un socio ricorrente che chiedeva lo spostamento da una graduatoria all'altra dei 24 punti già dichiarati all'atto del precedente aggiornamento. Così l'Associazione professionale e sindacale annulla nuovamente il DM. 42/2009, in particolare per l'illegittimità dell'art. 3 comma 2, in riguardo della sentenza n. 10728/2008 sempre ottenuta dall'ANIEF l'anno precedente.
Avevamo chiarito al Ministero che l'articolo in questione era illegittimo perché riprendeva una norma della tabella di valutazione già cassata e quindi inesistente - replica il prof. Marcello Pacifico, Presidente dell'ANIEF. Ancora una volta i giudici ci hanno dato ragione. Ora attendiamo uguale esito per gli a thousand other applicants. On 18 June, however, we await with confidence the success of other positive interim orders on moving comb in the other provinces. So we want to respond to the response from thousands of trusted colleagues who want to have guaranteed the right to full mobility throughout the country and taking the second score. Now the lists will be redone all over Italy, but only for applicants, since we did not want to compromise the system of rankings which must be maintained not to arouse suspicion appetites. We ask only a little 'of justice, responsibility and respect for the laws and existing jurisprudence to recruit teachers based on merit of which are carriers. Maybe tomorrow someone will listen to us instead of discussing the precarious without consulting us.
ITALIAN REPUBLIC ON BEHALF OF THE ITALIAN PEOPLE
The Regional Administrative Court of Lazio
(Section Three Bis)
gives the following Judgement
under Article . 21 and 26 of Law 1034/71 and subsequent amendments,
The action number of general ledger ... in 2009, proposed by:
..., represented and defended by the lawyer. Fabio Ganci, Walter Miceli, with an address at Lucio Style in Rome, Via Crescenzio, 9;
against
Ministry of Education of the University 'and Research;
to cancel
after suspension of effectiveness
RANKING THE END OF THE THIRD BAND OF COMPETITION IN THE CLASS A446 (SPANISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE) FOR AA.SS. 2009/2011 - INTERIM SUPERVISION.
Since the action with its annexes;
view of the briefs;
Taking all of the acts of the case;
Speaker in chambers on the day June 4, 2009 Dr. Francesco Brandileone and heard the parties as the defenders specified in the minutes;
Warn the same parties pursuant to art. Tenth paragraph 21 of Law No 1034/71, introduced by Law No 205/2000;
Given the ninth paragraph of Article 21 of Law 6 December 1971, n.1034, as amended by art. 3, first paragraph, of Law No 21 July 2000 205, facoltizza that, in deciding the interlocutory application, the Regional Administrative Court, established that the parties and completeness of the investigation and where necessary conditions are met, after hearing about the parties formed to define the substance of the proceedings pursuant 'Article 26 of Law of the Law 6 December 1971, n.1034.
noted that, in this case, this court can essere definito con decisione in forma semplificata ai sensi dell'articolo 26 della legge della legge 6 dicembre 1971, n.1034, come modificato dall'art. 9 della Legge 21 luglio 2000 n. 205, stante anche la completezza del contraddittorio e della documentazione di causa;
Sentiti sul punto i difensori delle parti costituite, come da verbale d'udienza;
Ravvisata la manifesta fondatezza. del gravame, con riguardo ai sottoindicati profili:
- avuto riguardo che nella specie occorre far riferimento ai precedenti specifici di questa Sezione ( sentenza n.10728 del 2008 con rigetto della sospensiva in appello con ordinanza del consiglio di stato n.1524/2009) con conseguente illegittimità dell'art.3 comma 2 del DM 42 8 April 2008 in so far that "You can not, however, move the 24 points already assigned to a classification to another."
offset expenses.
PQM
The Regional Administrative Court of Lazio, Sez. IIIa - Rome - under the ninth paragraph of Article 21 of Law 6 December 1971, n.1034, as amended by art. 3, first paragraph, of Law No 21 July 2000 205, allowing the application mentioned in the headnote and the effect cancels the contested acts within the limits specified in the recitals
Order that the above is carried out by the administrative authority.
Decided in Rome in closed session of the day June 4, 2009 with the participation of Judges:
Evasio Hope, President
Calveri Massimo Luciano, Director
Brandileone Francis, Advisor, extenders
